Claude Skills · Nonprofit fundraising

Seven skills for nonprofit fundraising.

Your development team is leaking time at three predictable points: funder discovery, drafting against unread RFPs, and 11 pm credibility checks. Generic Claude makes all three worse, producing polished proposals that say the wrong thing and statistics that don't survive a Google search. These seven skills are the scaffolding that fixes that, encoding the institutional knowledge that disappears when your senior development director retires.

The Skills

  1. Why · Prerequisite

    Skill-builder prompt

    Run this once before any of the other six. It extracts what your annual report, audited financials, 990, and past winning proposals already say, then asks focused questions only for the gaps. The output is four files (org-profile, funder-relationships, house-style, program-evidence) the other skills lean on. Skipping this means generic output.

    Open the prompt
  2. When · Start of grant cycle

    Grant prospect research

    Run quarterly for a midsize shop, monthly for a heavy institutional fundraiser. The skill produces a prioritization report your development director reads in twenty minutes, with a single recommendation rather than three options to pick from. It does not draft applications. Drafting is a separate skill, invoked after a human has chosen which funders are worth the effort.

    Open the skill
  3. When · After funder selection

    Grant application drafter

    Runs after a human has decided which funders to apply to. Produces a draft in the format the funder requires (LOI, concept note, or full proposal) with every gap clearly marked for program staff and finance to fill. It does not invent voice or numbers. If house-style or program-evidence files are missing, it flags every place they would have changed the output.

    Open the skill
  4. Why · The open door at Gates

    Gates Grand Challenges voice

    Most Gates Foundation funding is invitation-only. Grand Challenges is the open door, and it has unusually specific rules that don't generalize to other Gates programs. The skill produces a two-page proposal in the format Grand Challenges actually evaluates against, against a specific round and challenge. Conservative, incremental work loses against bold work even when the bold work is riskier.

    Open the skill
  5. Why · Eligibility check first

    Wellcome research voice

    Wellcome funds individual researchers at eligible institutions, not nonprofit programs. The skill runs an eligibility check first and stops if the lead applicant isn't a researcher at a UK, Republic of Ireland, or low- or middle-income country institution. For eligible applicants, it produces draft sections in the format Wellcome's online platform requires, against the specific scheme.

    Open the skill
  6. When · Day before submission

    Grant compliance check

    Run the day before submission, not the morning of. The skill produces a compliance memo flagging eligibility issues, format violations, internal inconsistencies, and funder-language alignment gaps. A junior staffer can run it. Each item is marked PASS, FAIL, or CANNOT DETERMINE FROM AVAILABLE INFORMATION. The skill does not edit the draft.

    Open the skill
  7. Why · The most common avoidable failure

    Content credibility audit

    The most common avoidable failure in nonprofit publishing is shipping a number, attribution, or causal claim that doesn't survive a basic check. AI drafting makes this worse, not better, because models are confident generators of plausible-sounding statistics. Run on op-eds, donor letters, board memos, and proposals. For high-stakes pieces, run it twice.

    Open the skill